Book Review - 1213 Words

Book Review by Martha Hall Findlay, March 2011 Approaching Public Administration – Core Debates and Emerging Issues Edited by Roberto P. Leone (Wilfrid Laurier University) and Frank L.K. Ohemeng (University of Ottawa); 2011, Emond Montgomery Publications I recommend this book to all Members of Parliament. I will go further, and suggest that it should be mandatory reading for all Ministers. As an MP, I was very pleased to be asked to read it and to provide my thoughts. As I responded when first asked to do this, â€Å"We are seeing some real challenges in our public administration, and this will encourage me to read a book that I know I should read, but which I might not otherwise rush to.† This is true, and therein lies a big challenge—this†¦show more content†¦The discipline that results from those forces, and how that affects all levels of management, does not naturally exist in government. The book has done a good job of offering the different perspectives to date, but I hope to see more discussion on how to combine the best of both worlds. It is telling that the essays discussing the role of the private sector in delivering public services are NOT part of this discussion, but found in a separate section of the book. My only comment on those chapters would be to suggest that our procurement processes need to evolve to better understand what is being asked for in terms of private delivery of services, why, and what limits there need to be. I hope to see more analysis comparing both theory and practice in this regard. As an MP, I particularly enjoyed the chapters addressing questions such as â€Å"Do Politicians Control Government?†, â€Å"Should the Bureaucracy be Politically Neutral?† and â€Å"Is Ministerial Responsibility a Dead Concept?† These go to the core of the relationship between, on the one side, the politicians and the policies they are mandated to implement by the people who elected them, and on the other side, the civil service, representing the need for a consistent, effective, efficient, reliable provision of the various services that over time we have deemed to be part of the public service. The essay by Tom Urbaniak, â€Å"Ministerial Responsibility: A Post Mortem† is based on a very blunt, butShow MoreRelatedBook Review : A Review Of A Book Review1431 Words   |  6 Pages Book reviews are just that: a review of a book. They can be used for news articles, blogs, or academic journals. A book review is more than just a book report. It can give the reader more of an insight into not just the book, but the author as well. Most authors write of what they know. For example, some authors have backgrounds in law enforcement so they write about cases they know or have worked. Other authors research groups of people, for example the Knights Templar, and write of whatRead MoreFor this assignment I read the book reviews Limits of Endurance ‘Defiant,’ by Alvin Townley; He700 Words   |  3 PagesFor this assignment I read the book reviews Limits of Endurance ‘Defiant,’ by Alvin Townley; He Accused ‘An Officer and a Spy,’ by Robert Harris; Breaking In ‘The Burglary,’ by Betty Medsger. For the book review Limits of Endurance ‘Defiant,’ by Alvin Townley the reviewer seem to have thought fondly of this book while writing majority positive things about this novel. The review He Accused which went over the novel ‘An Officer and a Spy,’ by Robert Harris seemed to be majority mixed to the pointRead MoreReview Of The Book Thief Essays1174 Words   |  5 PagesReview of: The Book Thief by Markus Zusak It seems sometimes like the market for young adult literature is written down to the readers, almost in a condescending manner. That is why a book like The Book Thief by Markus Zusak is so refreshing in this sea of cookie cutter romances and fantasies. While classified as a young adult novel, it deals with very serious themes. The book’s cover comes printed with this label: â€Å"It is 1939. Nazi Germany. The country is holding its breath. Death hasRead MoreBook Review: The Kite Runner Essay1110 Words   |  5 Pagesparents were killed and left him alone. All in all, the themes in this book shows us powerful messages. In addition, the author’s objective in this novel was probably to appeal to the reader’s emotion. In the book, there proves to many happy and sad moments. Such as when Amir finally got Baba to notice him a bit, and then there was the sad moment where Amir learned that Hassan has passed away. Also, the main conflict in this entire book was revolved around gaining acceptance and forgiveness from otherRead MoreBook Review : Gone Into History1183 Words   |  5 PagesDenise Kirkpatrick 12/8/2016 Essay 3 Gone into History What distinguishes a good read from great literature? James Patterson and Michael Ledwidge wrote a novel together named Gone, it was published in 2013 by the Hachette Book Group. Gone is an important piece of American Literature with their short, attention grabbing storylines. They use a colloquial style of writing that will have you feeling as if the story could be real, and their short chapters give an impression of it being fast paced andRead MoreReview : Book Review916 Words   |  4 Pageslargely ranged from mixed to positive, with criticism being much more nuanced and muted than the comment books and national press. Former Librarian of the United States Congress and Historian, Daniel Boorstin, was a notable exception, who led the charge against the exhibit commenting in the first guestbook that it was â€Å"perverse, historically inaccurate [and] destructive.† Most academic reviews were positive, especially praising the catalogue which provided considerably more nuance d and detailed analysisRead MoreBook Review822 Words   |  4 PagesBOOK REVIEW FREEDOM IS NOT FREE BY SHIV KHERA Submitted by: Particulars of the Book Title in full : Freedom is Not Free Written by : Shiv Khera Publisher : Macmillan India Ltd Price : Rs 295 Pages : 223 pages Aim 1. To review the book â€Å"FREEDOM IS NOT FREE â€Å"by Shiv Khera. AboutRead MoreBook Review1441 Words   |  6 PagesBOOK REVIEW COMPANY COMMAND THE BOTTOM LINE BY: JOHN G. MEYER,JR. IG ASSESSOR STUDENT OFFICER LT ABHISHEK SHARMA YO’S FD-1606 ‘B’ TP CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. About the author 3. About the book 4. Quality of presentation Read MoreBook Review : Book 903 Words   |  4 PagesFor this reading assignment we were reading chapters 1, 2, and 3, I find it helpful to me to read, take notes on and write out summaries as if this was two books. I will start off each time with Wes the author. As the book open we have Wes remembering a day that he and his older sister Nikki, were playing a game. Wes caught her and not knowing what to do, punched her in the face. Joy, Wes’ mother was very upset because Wes had hit a â€Å"girl†, and set him to his room. Wes’ father calmed Joy down byRead MoreBook Review1706 Words   |  7 PagesGagandeep Singh Book Review A thesis can be defined as something an author tries to prove to their audience. A History of the World in Six Glasses by Tom Standage provides a very brilliant thesis. Tom Standage’s thesis is to inform the audience reading the book about the six vital drinks that helped make up history. He explains this by showing how the drink influenced major events around the globe. He begins with beer which the oldest from the six drinks and ends with the youngest drink Coca-Cola

Analysis Of The Garden Of Eden - 1124 Words

In the traditional Church-inspired depiction of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, Eve is responsible for taking the fruit and tempting Adam. In contrast, Michelangelo shows egalitarianism by depicting both Adam and Eve being equally responsible. Adam and Eve are not interacting with each other but are both taking the forbidden fruit from the tree. By employing traditional Jewish imagery in his â€Å"Temptation and Expulsion of Adam and Eve†, Michelangelo promoted a revolutionary change to the relationship between Christianity and Judaism. In depicting the serpent according to Jewish teachings, and portraying Adam and Eve as having the same responsibility towards the sin, Michelangelo reprimanded the Church’s failure to recognize Jewish origins. His goal was to teach people to be open to universal ideas towards religion and philosophy. The Fall of Man – Titian 1550 Titian was a painter of the Venetian School. Forty years after Michelangelo painted â€Å"The Fall and Expulsion of Adam and Eve†, Titian completed â€Å"The Fall of Man† (Appendix II). Titian’s painting became part of the collection of King Phillip II. It is now found in The Prado. Titian depicted the same scene as Michelangelo but in a different manner. In contrast to Michelangelo, Titian did not incorporate Jewish teachings but added much richer colors to his painting. In addition, Titian portrayed the thematic element of the serpent with a baby’s face and the thematic element of the relationship between Adam and EveShow MoreRelatedGarden Of Eden Analysis1620 Words   |  7 PagesThe story Garden of Eden introduces the first man and woman that God created. He put the two of them in a garden where they did not have to provide for themselves. God said everything that was in that garden they could use to their abilities except the tree of good and evil. Everything was perfect until Eve let the Devil bribe her into eating from the tree. Once God found out, he came to the garden looking for them. When they heard his voice they hid. Here is where the alienation comes in. God hadRead MoreAnalysis Of The Garden Of Eden978 Words   |  4 Pages The painting chosen to examine is The Garden of Eden by Francesco Solimena. This painting was created between 1725-30. The medium of the painting is oil on canvas. The scale, although not specified, appears to be about a couple feet high and a couple feet long. The general subject matter is Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden. It seems to be before they have discovered the forbidden fruit. The figures seem to be embracing everything the garden has to offer, they seem content and comfortable in theirRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book Garden Of Eden 1521 Words   |  7 PagesPart A: †¢ Garden of Eden- Genesis 3:8 The Garden of Eden is what God made in order to place the first man ever created. God also grew beautiful tress in the garden, including the the tree of life and the three of knowledge of good and evil. †¢ Tower of Babel- Genesis 11:1-9 The Tower of Babel is a tower that was built in order to show that the people in the town can make a name for themselves, and not be moved all around different places on Earth. The top of the tower was built to reach heaven. †¢Read MoreAnalysis Of The Poem The Garden Of Eden 1915 Words   |  8 PagesUpon entering the Garden of Eden, one will find a bountiful place where two naà ¯ve humans reside. Eden’s beauty surpasses the imaginable; it contains crystal rivers, friendly animals, and trees bearing wondrous fruit. Adam and Eve live under the care of God. Dwelling in this beautiful garden free from sin allows one to assume that Adam and Eve are created pure and good. However, free will prevents the pair from remaining sinless. Humans are not pure because of their ability to choose. Milton believesRead MoreAnalysis Of Fritz Lang s Metropolis And The Garden Of Eden 1955 Words   |  8 PagesFreder, in a lush garden surrounded by a harem of beautiful and scantily clad women. This scene was likened to the Garden of Eden by Jerold J. Abrams in The Dialectic Enlightenment in Metropolis (167), as Freder is happy and innocent while inside it, and knows nothing other than the heavenly world he was given. Ironically though, what leads to his â€Å"casting out† of the garden, is not a devilish figure, but rather an angelic one. He first spots Maria who takes children to the garden, referring to theRead MoreAnalysis Of Enuma Elish s The Garden Of Eden Essay2327 Words   |  10 Pages.. There was nothing ... nothing but Old Father Apsu and Mummu-Tiamat, Mother of All Living. This describes a series of Gods that were created and later gained wisdom leading to a similarity to Genesis presenting the tree of knowledge in the Garden of Eden and so says: Increasing in wisdom, in understanding and in ...strength. Apsu planned to destroy the gods to form a universe of order in a chaotic world. Ea is another god who kills Apsu to prevent what he had planned. Genesis also describes aRead MoreThe Use of Symbolism in Rappaccinis Daughter1295 Words   |  6 Pagesimagination, analysis, and poetic wording. His short stories are known for their originality and for their ability to provoke the readers thoughts. Although a large portion of his stories are allegories, Hawthornes preference is to draw more heavily on symbolism (Pennell 13). His use of symbols adds depth to his stories and helps to reveal different aspects of his characters. In Rappaccinis Daughter, Hawthorne uses symbolism to create a modern day tale of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. ThereRead MoreThe Sacred Space And Sacred Spaces Forged By The Divine1582 Words   |  7 Pages36). Using a comparative analysis of biblical texts and scholarly articles, this paper will discuss how a sacred space, specifically Jerusalem, manifests itself through God’s choosing. Therefore Jerusalem is the holy dwelling place of the divine, because God chose it through his application of multiple hierophanies and his establishment of axes mundi within the city’s walls. Jerusalem as a sacred dwelling place is reflected though its similarities to the Garden of Eden, where God created the firstRead MoreHuman Sin in Boschs Garden of Delights Essay1569 Words   |  7 PagesHuman Sin in Boschs Garden of Delights Hieronymus Bosch, a Nertherlandish painter is known for his fantastic visual interpretations of hell, death sin and folly. Little is known about Bosch except that he spent his life in the provincial town of sHertogenbosch and that he died an old man in 1516. His work, full of weird and seemingly irrational imagery has proved so difficult to interpret that much of it despite the remarkable insights contributed by recent research, remains unsolved. This studyRead MoreAnalysis Of Nathaniel Hawthorne s The Great Gatsby 1579 Words   |  7 Pagestherefore his literature demonstrates it’s religion. For example, when Giovanni, the medical student, is observing Doctor Rappaccini’s garden. The first thing he notices is all the great vegetation. As he continues observing, he sees Rappaccini is touching the plants with gloves and he is being very careful not to inhale its fragrance. He wonders if this garden is the Eden of modern times in the following passage: Nevertheless, in spite of the deep intelligence on his part, there was no approach to intimacy

Disagreement Aid in Pursuit of Knowledge free essay sample

â€Å"The important thing in science is not so much to obtain new facts as to discover new ways of thinking about them.† William Lawrence Bragg The heart of science is an essential balance between two seemingly contradictory attitudes- an openness to new ideas, no matter how strange they may be, and the other is to be skeptical of all ideas, old and new. Theories in the sciences are built around hypotheses that are supported with evidence, and that corresponds to and is coherent with current knowledge. Most importantly, theories in the sciences must, by nature be able to be falsified. Theories by definition can never be proven completely right; at best, they can stay untouched by arguments of the opposition. As a result, throughout history, humans have been known to argue and disagree on just about everything. From religion to science and with a wide range of perspectives, it does not seem as if humans will agree and be on the same page as each other. Disagreement is central to the process. Disagreements in most cases are thought to be negative and quite often they are negative but it can be positive at the same time when it leads to the search of new knowledge. Logically, disagreements can lead to the pursuit of knowledge. I think that disagreement is necessary for a deeper understanding in all endeavors. If we only surround ourselves with those who agree with us then we will never stretch our minds or test our limitations. In natural sciences, it is very common for scientists to argue with one another regarding academic findings or theories because of their emotions. When a new theory is presented, scientists will immediately try to counter the theory, resulting in disagreements. They may disagree in terms of the set-up of experiment, methodology, data collection or analysis. These disagreements will result in new experiments or research being conducted by those who disagree, thereby aiding in the pursuit of knowledge. The pursuit of knowledge helps scientists to find problems and discover new evidence to improve their ideas. As a result, new evidence is available and more research can be made to refine a theory or idea. Since no ideas are complete, they can be changed as time goes by with new findings. An example would be the popular disagreement of creationism and the theory of evolution. Darwin disagreed with the theory of creationism leading to his pursuit of knowledge and his development of evolution. His disagreement resulted in his desire to answer his questions to satisfy his natural curiosity. Many people thought Darwin’s theory was blasphemy to the church and disregarded his theory. Despite these accusations, Darwin’s pursuits of knowledge lead to the discovery of natural selection and furthered knowledge. Without his disagreement of creationism, we would not have obtained the knowledge of natural selection. In the human sciences, disagreements also aids in the pursuit of knowledge. Disagreements may result in new research or it may be in the form of new ideas or perspectives. Due to the experiments not easily replicated in the human sciences, it is common to come up with alternatives points of views. So, the pursuit of knowledge can be aided by new views and theories as a disagreement to earlier views. Emotion and culture can elicit disagreement. This is more important in human science than natural science. People have different ways of viewing development. The two main economic disagreements include Keynesian economics and free-market economics by Hayek. The Keynes-Hayek Showdown has been popular in response to government involvement in the economy. Economists in different countries and within a same country often disagree about the correct method to deal with economic problems. Government and politics when they disagree, they will try to come up with different solutions. The new solution represents new knowledge developed in order to further research. Cultural background in the human sciences can highly influence disagreements and aid to the pursuit of knowledge. Take for example women’s rights and its development throughout the years. In the Victorian Era, culture played a role in which allowed society to view women as property and dependent upon a man to be able to make it in the world. Little attention was given to women since they did not have any rights. It took activists and reformers’ disagreement of male oppression to fight for their rights to vote and have a voice for themselves. Women such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott fought for women’s rights and formed the National American Woman Suffrage Association. Many campaigns were set up for women’s suffrage and took nearly 100 years to win that right. On August 26, 1920, the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was finally ratified, allowing all American women and declaring for the first time that they, like men, deserve all the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. If not for the disagreement of culture standards and challenging it, women would not have been able to receive the same rights as men. Due to the fact that the human mind is designed to believe in falsification, disagreement will never end with ideas or experiments. Different methodology, uncertainty and evaluation in natural science provide the new knowledge only if the result is more applicable than the previous theory. Once you have a working theory then you would expect your results to confirm your theory, which results in confirmation bias. For example, if you get a working theory that says that cells behave in a certain way then you will expect that you can make a prediction and it will be true. If it does not come true, this shows that your theory is wrong and your desire to prove your theory helps to drive your pursuit of knowledge. The more evidence you find to support your theory, the more confident you become that your theory is right. For example, Nicolaus Copernicus’ model of a sun-centered solar system was developed to prove Claudius Ptolemy’s model of an earth-centered solar system wrong. Copernicus’ disagreement aided his pursuit of knowledge and lead to his discovery of the earth revolving around the sun rather than the sun revolving around the earth. Through his disagreement, he was able to formulate the model accordingly to his evidence he gathered. Additionally, falsification allows scientists to research and develop new ideas to contribute to already discovered knowledge. The new ideas create a window for innovations to arise in the world through the discovered knowledge. While disagreements are good, too many disagreements can slow down the pursuit of knowledge in the sciences since perception can elicit disagreement. At some point, an agreement is required to allow conflicting theories to be put to rest in order to move on and pursue further knowledge of other subjects. Otherwise, researchers may not know which direction they should take and may end up confused with what to do. With too many disagreements, anomalies occur in the development of research and become questionable evidence. Additionally, science regulations would become strict since there is no agreement, which allows us to disregard all â€Å"accepted† knowledge in the sciences. The challenges of disagreement are the inability to believe theories presented to us since they are so frequently disagreed on. Too many alternative views can end up muddying the situation. Sometimes, much progress in the pursuit of knowledge can be achieved when we agree, then we can proceed much faster in the pursuit of knowledge. In most cases, it does not advance knowledge but restrict it from developing into something much more. Overall, I believe that disagreement between individuals is a key factor that unravels more knowledge learned than before. We all definitely have blind spots, and the different views of people may help us in achieving greater knowledge. However, it is only effective when based on reason as way of knowing. The disagreement makes you changes your model, your theory and it does not always prove the previous to be wrong it only shows that the new theory is more reliable. Falsification helps science to progress and is always followed by a pattern shift. I personally like disagreements simply because it helps me to gain new knowledge. Despite disagreement can become somewhat out of control, the conclusions achieved are definitely worth it. Therefore, in order to move on the next level in both natural and human science we need to disagree.

Osmosis Experiment Essay Example

Osmosis Experiment Essay Aim:- To find out what happens when potato chips are put in different strength sugar solutions.Prediction:- I think that the chips we place in the stronger solution will shorten in length. In the distilled water I think that the length will increase. The amount that the chips shorten will be determined by the strength of the solution, the weaker the solution the less they will shrink.Hypothesis:- Osmosis is the movement of water across a partially permeable membrane from a region of high water concentration to a region of lower water concentration. This happens in our experiment because; the outer layer of the potato chips is a partially permeable membrane. These have tiny holes in them, which only water molecules can get through. Inside the potato chips there are sugar molecules and a few water molecules.If we place the potato chip in a water solution because the water molecules in the chip and in the water are bouncing around they are going to find there way through the holes. But because there are more water molecules on the out side in the solution there are going to be more molecules going through into the chip tan out of it, because of this the chip will increase in size. The sugar molecules are much larger and are unable to pass through the partially permeable membrane. Take a look at the picture below.Preliminary Work:- In our preliminary work we used a partially permeable membrane, which in this experiment was Visking Tubing, filled with a sugar solution. In the top of the Visking tubing we placed a tube, then placed it in a beaker of water. The water molecules diffused into the Visking Tubing through Osmosis, because the sugar molecules in the Visking Tubing are to large to pass through the partially permeable membrane the contents of the tubing gets larger and the solution makes its way up the tube in the top of the Visking Tubing.Method:- We will cut up 10 pieces of potato to the same length, which will be 3.5cm, there will be ten pieces so that we can do each strength twice. The potato chips will all be measured using the same ruler so if the ruler is out, all the potato chips will have the same amount out. They will all be taken from the same potato so we know the have the same water and sugar content. We will be uses the strengths: Distilled water, 0.2m, 0.4m, 0.6m, and 1.0m. Using test tubes we will put one piece of potato in each, then we will 6ml of solution to the tube. Then we will put them in a test tube rack and leave for 1 hour at the minimum to get the best results. If we leave it for to long the potato chips start to go rotten. We will take each one twice so that we can get an average.Safety:- If we spill any of the solutions on the floor we will have to clean it up straight away otherwise someone could slip over on it and serious injure themselves. Also we should be careful when using the scalpel because it will be very sharp.The results table we will Use:-ConcentrationTry 1BeforeTry1AfterTry 2BeforeTry 2AfterAve rageDistilled Water0.2m0.4m0.6m1.0mObtaining EvidenceAim :-To find out what happens when potato chips are put in different strength sugar solutions.Prediction and Hypothesis :-Same as in the planMethod :- As PlannedLength Of Potato StickConcentration (m)Try 1Length Before (mm)Try 1Length After (mm)Try 2Length Before (mm)Try 2Length After(mm)Average Length After (mm)Change in the length of chip (mm)Distilled Water3537353637+20.2353635343600.43535353334-10.63533353333-21.03532353131-3Equation to work out the average = Try 1 After x Try 2 After / 2= Average AfterAnalysisScientific Explanation :- Osmosis is the movement of water across a partially permeable membrane from a region of high water concentration to a region of lower water concentration. This happens in our experiment because; the outer layer of the potato chips is a partially permeable membrane. These have tiny holes in them, which only water molecules can get through. Inside the potato chips there are sugar molecules and a few water molecules.If we place the potato chip in a water solution because the water molecules in the chip and in the water are bouncing around they are going to find there way through the holes. But because there are more water molecules on the out side in the solution there are going to be more molecules going through into the chip tan out of it, because of this the chip will increase in size. The sugar molecules are much larger and are unable to pass through the partially permeable membrane.From looking at the graph and the table of results I can see that Osmosis has taken place in this experiment. I know this because if we look at the distilled water we can see that water molecules have moved through the partially permeable membrane of the potato chips in to an area of lower water concentration, we can tell this because the chip has increased in length. Then if we have a look at the 0.6m concentration we can see that this chip has decreased in length, so again we can see osmosi s has taken place because the water molecules from inside the potato chip have more from the high concentration of water molecules to the lower level of concentration.EvaluationOur experiment on the whole was a success with no problems all the way through. As far as we can tell our experiment was scientifically sound. We didnt have any major anomalies in our set of results, but we did have a few off the line of best fit. If you look back at my graph you will see that there are two, the 0.4m and the 1.0m, these could have been caused by, us not measuring them as accurately as we did with all the other ones, these two could have had less solution than the other ones or they could have been a different size to the other chips.I think that in this experiment we should have had a continuous concentration level, by this I mean that it shouldnt of gone: Distilled water, 0.2m, 0.4m, 0.6m, 1.0m. There should have been a 0.8m in there to give us more accurate readings. We can predict from our graph what it should be but that is exactly an accurate way of doing it.To follow up this experiment with another experiment I would do the same thing again but this time I would use more concentrations, they would be distilled water, 0.1m, 0.2m, 0.3m, 0.4m, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0m. This would give us a more accurate reading. Also to get a more accurate reading I would do each one 5 times to get a much better average over all 5. I would then plot these into the same table as I have done is this experiment and then draw to different types of graphs, to get a better look at my results.